cloth and culture NOW the project the artists the exhibition the book

 

 

Cloth & Culture NOW
the artists - Merja Winqvist, Finland

During my childhood in the 1950s, the vast majority of Finns lived in the countryside. At that time, people in the country still largely lived in what was virtually a nature culture, with buildings, implements and food made and produced almost entirely self-sufficiently. Knowledge and craft skills were passed down from generation to generation. I spent my early childhood in the country, and it was at that time that I became familiar with the different forms of the natural economy – farming, hunting and fishing, domestic animals, handicrafts – along with nature, and all the rest – the trees and plants, the lakes and rivers, the birds, the fish and other animals. At home almost everything, from furniture to home textiles, was made by hand. It was these childhood experiences that left in the back of my mind, in my unconscious, the moods and motifs that I have worked on in my art.

Against this background I naturally found myself studying textile art and environmental design at the University of Art and Design Helsinki. I developed an interest in the aboriginal cultures of other countries. I found the same forms and structures in Africa, and in America and Asia. The furnishings and fittings and the living systems that people have created resemble each other everywhere, and have been refined according to their purpose to suit the local materials and sources of livelihood. Function has shaped our concept of beauty – what’s good is beautiful. This has generally been the starting point for the work of Finnish architects and designers. In the latter half of the 1950s, it was the public buildings and industrially produced furniture and utensils in the home that brought the trend for functionalism to the attention of ordinary Finns.

For example, people could buy stylish, clean-lined, practical crockery from country-village co-operative shops, objects that are now classics and rare collectables, or they could conduct their business in modern, well-lit town halls or libraries designed to be on a human scale.

In my own work I have applied the ideal of functionalism by simplifying the forms as much as possible, while avoiding unnecessary decoration. The parts of the work that look like decoration have an important functional significance in terms of the cohesion and durability of the sculpture.

I frequently simplify the idea and theme of an artwork so as to invest it with symbolic value. For example, the boat motif derives from the old Finnish way of life and mythology. The Tuonela, the river of death, is crossed in a boat to reach the afterworld. In ancient Egypt, too, the dead person was equipped for the final journey with a boat or pictures of boats. This theme has several parallels nowadays, too, such as business life and in the overcoming of difficulties. Meanwhile, in many cultures the circle of the sun symbolises life energy and divinity, and the horn sexuality and fertility, as does the snake, which again in China is a mark of the secret and shameful. The egg in Christian symbolism depicts grace and the possibility of a new life. My work on the theme of meadows is based on the Chinese ideogram for meadow.

The main material for my work is unbleached paper, which I twist with glue into pipe-like sticks reminiscent of wood. I join these small bits together with tightly knotted thread. The brown kraft paper that I use does not contain bleaching agents that would make the fibres brittle and it looks like a natural material.

Paper was used in post-war Finland, during the recession of the 1940s, as an ersatz material, as a substitute for textile materials. It was spun into yarn or treated to make it softer. From my childhood I remember the paper sheets in train sleeping carriages, and the paper string and other packaging supplies in shops. My parents told me about worn-out wooden-soled paper shoes, about curtains and frock cloth woven out of paper fibre. It was then that viscose fibre from spruce trees began to be developed in Finland, initially to replace textile fibres. It is said that Finns live off paper, and the paper industry has been and still is Finland’s biggest industrial sector.

I base my works on structure. For twenty years, I have been investigating the internal tensions inside forms, and the way that the smallest possible amount of material will give rise to the most compact and enduring form. I am interested in the structures of plants and animals, in which durability is based on form and not on mass – in tissues and crystals, straws, leaves, skeletons, eggshells and so on. I leave the internal structures in my sculptures visible. We often come across the same form language in Finnish traditional log-building, and in contemporary architecture, too – with the bearing structures and joints left visible as part of the overall look of the building, as if to speak of their function and to create tension and rhythm in the space.

When I have put on exhibitions in different countries and continents, I have received positive feedback in comments to the same effect, regardless of the culture. This makes me glad – I feel I have succeeded in awakening memories in all nations of times when people lived more primitively on nature’s own terms, and with respect for it. My art has evoked mental images of people’s direct effect on the rest of nature.

 

FINLAND

Helena Hietanen Agneta Hobin Outi Martikainen
Kristiina Wiherheimo Merja Winqvist Silja Puranen

 

 

University College for the Creative Arts
 
copyright © Lesley Millar 2006-07| links |contact | sitemap